Applying Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation to Eastern Arguments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Specializing the Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation to the Jaina Seven-Valued Logic
Argumentation is a dialectical process of knowing things (inquiry) and justifying them (advocacy) in general. Computational argumentation has been recognized as a social computing mechanism or paradigm in the multi-agent systems community. We have developed a computational argumentation framework that basically consists of EALP (Extended Annotated Logic Programming) and LMA (Logic of Multipleva...
متن کاملCollective Argumentation and Disjunctive Logic Programming
An extension of an abstract argumentation framework is introduced that provides a direct representation of global conflicts between sets of arguments. The extension, called collective argumentation, turns out to be suitable for representing semantics of disjunctive logic programs. Collective argumentation theories are shown to possess a four-valued semantics, and are closely related to multiple...
متن کاملMulti-Valued and Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks
In this paper we further progress the analysis of the recently introduced multi-valued argumentation frameworks ( ). are an extension of Dung’s abstract argumentation, where arguments have a degree of truth associated with them. Here we describe a list of properties of considering the major multi-valued logics such as those proposed by Gödel, Zadeh and Łukasiewicz. We then propose a computation...
متن کاملMulti-valued Argumentation Frameworks
In this paper we explore how the seminal Dung’s abstract argumentation framework can be extended to handle arguments containing gradual concepts. We allow arguments to have a degree of truth associated with them and we investigate the degree of truth to which each argument can be considered accepted, rejected and undecided by an abstract argumentation semantics. We propose a truth-compositional...
متن کاملTowards Constraints Handling by Conflict Tolerance in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
In this paper we incorporate integrity constraints in Dung-style abstract argumentation frameworks. We show that even for constraints of a very simple form, standard conflict-free semantics for argumentation frameworks are not adequate as conflicts among arguments should sometimes be accepted and tolerated. For this, we use conflict-tolerant semantics and show how corresponding extensions may b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- IEICE Transactions
دوره 88-D شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005